What the products do, and where they stop.

The products address different assessment objects. PARITY compares matched routes. MIRROR reconstructs conditional variants. MOMENT tests a person-system-context vulnerability event. Combining all three into one form would create unnecessary burden and obscure the question the organisation must answer.

No. Taxonomies remain useful for naming visible practices. The suite adds journey, architecture and contextual analysis where the visible category does not settle the mechanism or effect.

No. They produce a reasoned methodological conclusion for a defined scope and evidence base. Courts, regulators and professional advisers may apply different legal tests or reach different conclusions.

Not for the core outcome. An optional future writing assistant could help convert structured findings into plain language, but deterministic and inspectable rules should control the outcome route.

A single score can conceal a serious obstruction or exploitative adaptation by averaging it against unrelated strengths. The method keeps findings, evidence and outcomes visible.

No. Security, fraud prevention, identity verification and irreversible consequences may justify additional steps. The organisation must identify and evidence the reason and use no more friction than the purpose requires.

Examples include subscribe/cancel, accept/reject, consent/withdraw, purchase/refund, upgrade/downgrade, account creation/deletion, data addition/removal and automated support/human escalation.

Yes. Manual journey construction can include telephone calls, postal forms, in-person requirements and staff interactions.

Not for every assessment. A team may begin with synthetic testing, feature-flag records, experiment specifications and model-output categories. A stronger conclusion requires stronger evidence. Missing access may itself prevent the organisation from supporting a claim about the system.

No. Variation may support accessibility, localisation, safety, fraud prevention or consumer-requested personalisation. MIRROR asks whether the organisation can explain the trigger and purpose and whether protected routes remain effective.

Only where evidence supports reconstruction. The tool can organise logs, feature flags, variant records and test results. It cannot recover a missing experience from nothing.

No. It assesses a defined interaction among person-side conditions, system knowledge and context. The result attaches to the scenario and design, not to a permanent status assigned to the person.

No. The proposed licence expressly prohibits using the method to identify consumers who are easier to influence or to optimise exploitation.

It is an alternative experience against which the proposed adaptation can be tested, such as a non-personalised route, a cooling-off intervention, delayed monetisation or a design that gives the consumer greater control.

The planned applications process and save information locally in the browser by default. Users can export a JSON project file and PDF. A production security review must determine the final storage and encryption design.

No. The standard organisation licence covers one named legal entity. Group-company, adviser, consultancy, audit, external-client and white-label rights require separate terms.

The public pages describe concept products. Development will proceed in stages: PARITY first, MIRROR second and MOMENT third, followed by controlled pilots and commercial terms.