The Innovation Mandate
A proposal for a binding duty of evidence and public reason-giving when digital regulators choose among materially different lawful routes affecting rights, legal certainty, investment and scale.
What the report examines
A proposal for a binding duty of evidence and public reason-giving when digital regulators choose among materially different lawful routes affecting rights, legal certainty, investment and scale.
- A binding secondary meta-duty that applies within the lawful choice set rather than weakening the rights floor.
- Supervisory impact statements, public evidence registers and cross-regulatory compatibility notes.
- A requirement that consequential regulatory choices become evidence-based, proportionate, innovation-aware and publicly reasoned.
From legal boundary to operational consequence.
The report sits within DigiData’s wider practice of connecting legal interpretation with use cases, institutional incentives, evidence and implementable choices. The downloadable PDF remains the authoritative publication; this page provides a concise, indexable summary and clear route to the source.
Need to apply this analysis to a live decision?
DigiData can provide independent research, expert evidence, regulatory strategy, training or a structured briefing grounded in the relevant system and institutional context.