Insights

Independent analysis, organised around the questions that recur.

The page separates substantial DigiData research essays from the ten most recent LawBhoy posts. Existing Substack publications retain clear provenance; local mirrors use the DigiData design without embedding third-party feeds or tracking scripts.

Featured DigiData research

Long-form analysis with downloadable companion papers.

These pieces provide the conceptual foundations for the TRACE and AUIA product architecture and the wider work on contextual anonymisation.

TRACE and AUIA

From Sticker to Passport

How contextual anonymisation can become a portable, auditable and time-bounded claim.

Read on DigiData
Anonymisation

Non-Personal Data Is Not One Thing

Europe needs a taxonomy that separates status, route, scope, artefact form, circulation and assurance.

Read on DigiData
The latest ten from LawBhoy

Current positions across digital regulation.

The archive runs from the Digital Omnibus and anonymisation through supervisory accountability, consumer AI, NeuroAI and children’s rights.

Digital Omnibus

The Omnibus Must Build the Road

The EDPB has supplied an analytical map for anonymisation; the legislature must create the assurance system that makes it usable.

Read on LawBhoy
Innovation

Anonymisation, Innovation and the Missing Route to Lawful Use

The EDPB has improved the legal test, but organisations still need a reusable route to contextual anonymisation.

Read on LawBhoy
Anonymisation

Anonymisation, Two Ways

The EDPB’s new guidelines complicate the Commission’s Article 6(11) DMA playbook.

Read on LawBhoy
Identifiability

Context Is Not a Loophole

A defence of contextual identifiability after EDPS v SRB and against the claim that actor-relative analysis weakens protection.

Read on LawBhoy
EDPB

Anonymisation After SRB: The EDPB Chooses Context, Not Evasion

The EDPB accepts contextual anonymisation, but its framework remains less operationally usable than the Digital Omnibus needs.

Read on LawBhoy
Regulatory strategy

The Innovation Mandate

Europe does not need a weaker digital rulebook. It needs regulators who must show their work.

Read on LawBhoy
Data access

Anonymous Enough to Share, Personal Enough to Police?

The unresolved contradiction in the Commission’s Article 6(11) DMA search-data remedy.

Read on LawBhoy
Consumer interest and AI

The Law Should Not Discipline Consumers for Being Human

A response to the DRCF’s Consumer Interest and AI work, centred on the limits of responsibilising consumers for system-level design choices.

Read on LawBhoy
Neurodata and AI

The Machine That Predicts Your Next Thought

Notes on neurodata, predictive systems and the legal consequences of increasingly intimate inference.

Read on LawBhoy
Children’s rights

The Addiction Panic Is a Poor Basis for Children’s Rights

A critique of addiction-centred narratives and a case for evidence-led, function-specific child-safety regulation.

Read on DigiData
Publication model

DigiData archive, clear provenance.

Where a post was first published through LawBhoy, DigiData identifies the original source and uses an appropriate canonical arrangement. New articles can be added from Markdown now and through a content management system after the design is approved.

Start a conversation

A difficult digital-regulation question deserves more than a generic compliance answer.

Tell DigiData what decision, dispute or policy problem you need to resolve. The initial enquiry form is designed to establish scope, urgency and the expertise the work may require.